No, I’m not dead!
Sorry I haven’t updated in ages…I will resume posting on this blog…and I’ve got something for ya!
Thanks to NY asshole attorney-general Elliot Spitzer, Yahoo is now requiring you to be 18 to use their chat-rooms. What a bunch of bullshit designed to pander to overprotective parents. You don’t have to worry about a goddamned chat room to worry about fucking paedophiles. Most people who molest kids ALREADY KNOW THEM IN PERSON, you fucking IDIOTS! Most of the chat-room flirting is just stupid flirting and youth expressing their sexuality…but of course these stupid parents and politicians get so freaked out that their kids have SEXUALITIES! Guess what, they DO! Get your heads out of the fucking clouds and realise that! You know who’s REALLY abusing kids and molesting them? Relatives. There are always random losers, but the majority of child-abuse and molestation cases are by PARENTS and other FAMILY MEMBERS. So get the fuck over the bloody chat rooms and worry about the kids being sent to ‘rehabilitation’ programmes that rob them of their spirits, or the kids that are really being abused instead of going up in arms about stupid shit like this.
Anyway, why are you discriminating against the youth instead of the paedophiles who target them? I think it’s because if you’re not yet 18, you’re not given a proper chance to participate in the government. However, that is still wrong to mistreat youth that way. The people who should be punished for mucking around in the Yahoo chatrooms are the fucking paedos, not the teenagers whom they prey on.
Grrr! It’s so backwards! It reminds me of what George Carlin said about gun laws: “They’re talking about banning toy guns….AND THEY’RE KEEPING THE FUCKING REAL ONES!!!!”
Comment by SciVille — 14 October, 2005 @ 6:37 am
You’re definitely right…It’s fucked…and George Carlin is brilliant.
Comment by Jess Caralize — 16 October, 2005 @ 11:11 pm
>The people who should be punished for mucking around in the Yahoo chatrooms are the fucking paedos, not the teenagers whom they prey on.
Very true. It’s like when I was reading The Scapegoat Generation (Mike Males! Woohoo!) and he pointed out that when one of the sexual activity surveys asked the girls (eighth grade I think) what they meant by “sexually active”, only 14% of the sexually active girls had a history of sex without a history of rape…he pointed out that that’s like calling someone who’s robbed “criminally active”.
Plus, how easy is it for a pae/edophile to get some kid in bed with them from a chat room? Stats say, not very: the easiest way, and the way used most often, is to have kids–or nephews or brothers or the kids of your friends–and get together with them. Stranger danger? Really? I think we should be more worried about the person paying for the Internet connection than what the kid’ll see/hear when using it….
(And this time, it looks like I’m keeping this website unless blogspot goes haywire, btw.)
Comment by Gwen — 20 October, 2005 @ 1:25 am
>The people who should be punished for mucking around in the Yahoo chatrooms are the fucking paedos, not the teenagers whom they prey on.
Very true. It’s like when I was reading The Scapegoat Generation (Mike Males! Woohoo!) and he pointed out that when one of the sexual activity surveys asked the girls (eighth grade I think) what they meant by “sexually active”, only 14% of the sexually active girls had a history of sex without a history of rape…he pointed out that that’s like calling someone who’s robbed “criminally active”.
Plus, how easy is it for a pae/edophile to get some kid in bed with them from a chat room? Stats say, not very: the easiest way, and the way used most often, is to have kids–or nephews or brothers or the kids of your friends–and get together with them. Stranger danger? Really? I think we should be more worried about the person paying for the Internet connection than what the kid’ll see/hear when using it….
(And this time, it looks like I’m keeping this website unless blogspot goes haywire, btw.)
Comment by Gwen — 20 October, 2005 @ 1:26 am
>The people who should be punished for mucking around in the Yahoo chatrooms are the fucking paedos, not the teenagers whom they prey on.
Very true. It’s like when I was reading The Scapegoat Generation (Mike Males! Woohoo!) and he pointed out that when one of the sexual activity surveys asked the girls (eighth grade I think) what they meant by “sexually active”, only 14% of the sexually active girls had a history of sex without a history of rape…he pointed out that that’s like calling someone who’s robbed “criminally active”.
Plus, how easy is it for a pae/edophile to get some kid in bed with them from a chat room? Stats say, not very: the easiest way, and the way used most often, is to have kids–or nephews or brothers or the kids of your friends–and get together with them. Stranger danger? Really? I think we should be more worried about the person paying for the Internet connection than what the kid’ll see/hear when using it….
(And this time, it looks like I’m keeping this website unless blogspot goes haywire, btw.)
Comment by Gwen — 20 October, 2005 @ 1:26 am
yeah, you’re definitely right about the paedos. *nods*
Comment by Jess Caralize — 21 November, 2005 @ 11:50 pm
replica
Trackback by replica — 16 February, 2006 @ 4:12 pm
crib-bedding
Trackback by crib-bedding — 21 February, 2006 @ 5:50 pm
ringtone.devki.net
Comment by Eart — 7 April, 2006 @ 8:13 pm